Mental Health Video
Ocak 16, 2011 | Videos
dette er a short video on mental health and its statistics. When do I know if ikke har this video I was impressed by two of the people I’ve vil imødekomme do bättre Video. Video Rating: 4 / 5
Comments (25)
Advertisement
Popular Articles
-
Fat and desperate...need to lose 25 lbs by Aug. 28th?
50 Comments
-
How much would it cost to outfit a hospital bed at the intensive care level (equipment + supplies)?
39 Comments
-
Is it OK with you that 50 million Americans do not have ANY Health cover?
34 Comments
-
Atheists: Would you fight to the bitter end to save your life if you were given a terminal medical diagnosis?
33 Comments
Health Videos Post
- Auto-Tune the News #9: Nobel. health care. United Nations.
- Hair Remover - Sugar Me Smooth - Hair Removal System
- The Health Insurance Racket
- The truth of mental disorders - Psychology
- Actual Audio: 1952 Asbestos Film
- Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
- Mesothelioma Lawyer Television Ad
- Waxing 101
- Pleural Mesothelioma Symptoms
- Diet Solution Program #7
Health Photos
Marry a Beautiful Latino girl online **rockmycity.info**
Marry a Beautiful Latino girl online **rockmycity.info**
Good info, however the sources and references should be identified on each page and not at the end of the video, so you don’t lose some individuals.
I have a mental illness and I hate it.
check basil buntings qualifications. top academic right. meet the man in a clinical setting, the bloke is worse than bad, he is harming patients. this i have observed first hand. he has/is treating my daughter. it would appear he does not consider a fact is a fact until he recognises it as so. the harm his written observations cause in legal situations like family court, are outrageous. when questioned he becomes hyper defensive of procedural diagnostics, but avoids the question. sound familiar?
i htink they should just be equals they may need more help…. but helping them only makes it worse makes them not be able to help themselves
instead of throwing mental health sufferers in hospitals, they should have more programs stressing diet and exercise, and medication should be kept at a minimum, because it leads to weight gain.
Come baby Russian ladies ** leefoxnow.info **
but its not quite as easy trying to deal with this. I been through depression, and in away I’m still going through it… . honestly I don’t know what got into me but there is good people out there thats willing to help- I hope we find it – you are not alone!
@Ragnarok187 when my computer *STOPS* ( made a grammatical error) being an asshole to me.
@Ragnarok187 cheers I’ll have a search for them when my computer is being an asshole to me.
@Ragnarok187 You didn’t understand what I meant, what I meant was, if 2 peer reviewed articles contradict each other, one of them will eventually be found false, I’ve yet to hear of either being found false, so it looks like we’ve made a moot point.
@vikeyev1 Do you really think that all peer reviewed articles will agree with one point of view? Cause that’s just idiotic. The reason for research is (and should always be) to examine if claims hold true, and to check other alternative/opposite perspectives. I’ve found peer reviewed articles in textbooks, but can’t always find them on a single database. You might wanna try searching more than just the single APA database, cause PsychINFO DOES show those 3 I mentioned as being peer reviewed.
@vikeyev1 The references are ‘Psychology and the status quo’ (Prilleltensky, 1989). ‘Shaping the intimate: Influences of the experience of everyday nerves’ (Healy, 2004). ‘The myth of mental illness’ (Szasz, 1960). ‘The bio-bio-bio model of madness’ (Read, 2005). ‘DSM-III and the politics of truth’ (Schacht, 1985). ‘Diagnosis’ (Boyle, 1999). Prill, Read and Schacht ARE peer reviewed, but not every database shows all articles. I couldn’t find the others either on the single database I searched.
@vikeyev1 Okay, you misread, it’s good you can accept that. It takes a big man to accept when he’s wrong or made a mistake. You abused me for no reason. As for the articles you’ve read, yes, you’ll find many articles contradict each other. If you’ll read Healy (2004), like I mentioned, up to 75% of articles may be ghost written (his claim, not mine) . A vast majority are funded by the drug companies, so no way would they publish articles that show their meds to be ineffective.
@Ragnarok187 Not only that a name and year are not adequate information as their tends to be multiple people of the same name publishing articles in the same year, at least quote the name of the article.
@Ragnarok187 Firstly I misread the part about chemical imbalance, secondly, your claiming that those are peer reviewed articles stating that the DSM is bullshit and that the medications don’t actually help, which is quite funny because that directly contradicts the peer reviewed articles I quoted. So someone here is full of shit and I can guarantee you it sure as hell ain’t me.
Lastly I searched through on APA and couldn’t find any of them.
@vikeyev1 You asked me for info for what I claimed, and one of the things I mentioned was the chemical imbalance, now you’re throwing abuse cause I mentioned something you asked me to give info on? And you claim none of it is peer reviewed. Prilleltensky, Read, and Schacht ARE peer reviewed, and I believe the others are too but couldn’t find them on PsychInfo. So none is peer reviewed you said, when clearly they are (at least 3 on the database I searched). So, by your reckoning, those ARE truth.
@Ragnarok187 Neuropsychological status of bipolar I disorder:
impact of psychosis (about the impact of a history of DSM–IV-defined psychosis on the neuropsychological status of participants)
Psychosis Endophenotypes in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder (about the link between bipolar and schizophrenia)
@Ragnarok187 WHEN IN FUCK DID I SAY IT WAS A CHEMICAL IMBALANCE YOU FUCKING DOLT!!!
Secondly none of that is peer reviewed, it hasn’t gone through the rigorous and brutal process that IS the peer review process. The peer review process weeds out the bullshit and leaves what is essentially the truth.
Here’s a couple peer reviewed articles you can search for,
The Neuropharmacology of Psychosis (about the therapeutic benefits of medication in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder)
@vikeyev1 cont… (again). “Dominant scientific paradigms often act to silence the dissent of critics rather than stimulate critical thinking” (Healy, 2004). “Science is no longer simply a way of satisfying the curiosity of the individual scientist: It has become a means of accumulating political power by particular interest groups” (Schacht, 1985). “has shown a clear bias in supporting the interests of the powerful and the status quo” (Prilleltensky, 1989)
@vikeyev1 cont… You can also look up Thomas Szasz. Also, name for me 1 medical test that shows a ‘chemical imbalance’. There are none. Not a test to point to one disorder, but a test to show a chemical imbalance. And if there is an ‘imbalance’, tell me what a ‘balance’ looks like. There are no reports that can show either. The imbalance thing was a hypothesis that’s just been repeated so often people accept it. It’s used to support the medical model, which supports the use of drugging people.
@vikeyev1 Which bit exactly? The DSM is written by psychiatrists. Psychiatry is almost completely bought out by drug companies (Read, 2005). Up to 75% of papers may be ghost written and omit negative info (Healy, 2004). Healy also stated that ‘disorders’ are marketed, which increased drug sales as awareness increased. The creation of medical paradigms creates demand for drugs. The literature consistently fails reliably identify underlying ‘symptoms’ of diagnostic groups (Boyle, 1999)
@Ragnarok187 Do you have any citations for anything you just claimed?
Are the people who supposedly “discovered” all of this even qualified to say so?
Why has none of this been published in the peer review literature?
@DaRkLyDrEamiNg000 Actually their have been many scientific studies into the therapeutic benefits of medication into the mentally ill. I quoted about 5 or 6 of them to another idiot on another video. Removing the stigma of mental illness, that was the one. It’s people like you that just can’t let go of the stigma. Mental illness is not something you can change just by deciding “hey, I’m gonna think and do differently today”, that’s not the way it works.